A bitter High Court dispute has broken out between possible neighbours above the construction of the wall in a coastal internet site in the north Dublin suburb, a case which has captivated countrywide focus pursuing an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed spouse and children house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of planning breaches, environmental issues, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Situations post about René Collier as well as the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has advanced right into a remarkably publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development will work at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a firm director respectively, find to create their relatives property. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of recognized citizens. According to the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining produced by their potential neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted beneath preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two residents of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their arranging authorization by creating a wall further than the boundaries of their web page, resulting in an encroachment on a Distinctive Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result regions are subject to rigorous controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments might have Long lasting ecological outcomes, notably inside a delicate coastal setting like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their arranging authorization, and say the wall, which can be partly constructed, is in the right posture. Their legal crew has characterised the motion being an try to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The pair accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding in order to preserve their check out, an allegation which has been repeated in court and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal organizing disputes, wherever sights of the sea are equally extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic endeavours with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the location, Based on sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded by way of waistline-higher water during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Situations, an image that has considering the fact that develop into emblematic on the intensity with the dispute. These actions weren't merely symbolic; they were being intended to gather Visible proof on the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Occasions described, describing how the two Adult men entered the water all through significant climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm drinking water to photograph the positioning turned The most putting descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations post about accountant Paul Feely observed that this kind of actions ended up cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief the wall extended into an area afflicted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined intimately because of the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become broadly searched phrases as viewers sought to be familiar with the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard additional submissions on no matter if interim orders need to be granted to halt design pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important instant inside the authorized timeline.
On the core in the dispute can be a disagreement in excess of boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep that the wall, as created, goes outside of what was authorised and intrudes into protected land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his examination of preparing files, René Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times maps, and disorders connected towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their motion is inspired by issue for environmental safety and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private watch, insisting as an alternative that it's about making certain that development at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've got explained their prolonged-standing relationship to the realm as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply looking to build a household home in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Exclusive Region of Conservation and say that each one will work happen to be completed based upon professional guidance and accredited designs. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea for the duration of a storm, will not alter the fundamental info.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how arranging disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute in excess of development of wall at coastal internet site has grown to be a shorthand description for your condition a large number of observers see as significantly popular. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats has started to become additional contentious.
The Irish Periods report about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Beforehand been involved with regional advocacy on organizing and environmental problems, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Occasions report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from extremely distinctive Specialist backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website with the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-large h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Times and René Collier waded by way of midsection-high water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the physical actuality from the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of your act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an extreme strategy.
Since the High Court proceedings continue on, the result stays uncertain. The courtroom need to establish if the wall as created complies with setting up authorization and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and organizing circumstances. However the human element continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Dwell alongside one another very long following the legal prices are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design will work at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, although the implications of the case increase over and above that address. For planners, developers, and citizens alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. It also underscores how speedily a local disagreement can escalate when elementary problems for instance environmental protection and residence legal rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a spot of natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre on the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful concerns. No matter if it will in the long run be altered, eliminated, or completed as planned will depend upon the court docket’s conclusions. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will possible proceed to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Among the most intently viewed preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.